Showing posts with label covid 19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label covid 19. Show all posts

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Informational Ecosystems and Fake News

Destroying Our Informational Ecosystem


What makes Fake News Fake?

1. Overwhelming repetition of select info that displaces higher priority information for the gain of special interests groups to distract the public from being truly informed in a timely manner.

2. Exaggerated or minimized content through omission or skewed emphasis to mislead the public and advance the agenda of a special interest.


3. The manipulated polarizing of opposing points of view to opposing consensuses as accelerations in social media sharing and reaction are used to push social division and reduce the communication of collaborative compromise.



The use of social media peaked during the 2016 election and for the first time its true destructive power was realized as external operatives used it to divide Americans against each other. The details of this ongoing form of intrusive manipulation were examined and reported on by the journalists of  PBS' Frontline. 

These broadcasts are listed below. 
They are VERY INFORMATIVE. 

"The Facebook Dilemma" parts 1and 2
and can be viewed by clicking the windows.

See Part 1 The Facebook Dilemma

See Part 2 The Facebook Dilemma
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuA4qxPbpQE

They describe RUSSIAN SPONSORED INVOLVEMENT in our election and Russian social media influence across the globe. These actions have led to frequent social disruptions and even murder as clandestine news sources controlled through Russian influence foment biased reactions and division.

(Some very clear examples are presented on Part 2 at minute 8:50-10:55 and 13:10-14:20 AND ESPECIALLY 20:30-26:20 where Russian sponsored operatives CREATED multiple OPPOSITION GROUPS on facebook and other platforms here in the US and organized OPPOSING PROTEST EVENTS in our cities, some of which were very destructive and violent.

You can also see how our Senate wrongly addressed Russian involvement with the pre-election Trump team on the CSPAN recording of Senate hearings from June 3. 2020.

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testifies on Crossfire Hurricane Investigation


In The Facebook Dilemma, investigators discovered thousands of instances where Russian operatives created division and discord among the American people by promoting very polarized and inflammatory websites and creating facebook-groups along with inflammatory posts for group followers to share. Their goal, to divide and paralyze America and destroy America's influence by crippling her system of Government.


Consider what you share. 

It seems that many of the fake sites don't even try to hide it anymore. Before you share, check who sent it and who their friends are. Check the site it came from. And most of all, check the intent. 


Are you really so driven that you 
are willing to be used by known 
enemies intent on destroying
 our nation?


Today, with the sudden eruption of these (well organized?) protests and riots, it seems apparent that something similar is happening. But this time, is it the Russians? Or are other actors involved? I guess only time will tell. But it is very obvious to anyone on line that the volume of divisive social media is accelerating and that much of it fits one of the FAKE categories. 

So how does on line media compare with Broadcast News? 
Is the News presented through our broadcast media also FAKE?

Consider how these questions apply?
1. Is it balanced, presenting the interests of multiple sides in the topics or conflict it covers?

2. Is it adequate in depth to clearly present a clear picture complete with opposing perspectives?

3. Is it distributed in a way that informs audiences with accurate and timely information, or is it marketed to provide little actual information and keep you emotionally hooked to maximize the gains of special interests or commercial sponsors?

Consider the emotionally charged coverage of the Covid 19 Pandemic, and the death of  George Floyd in the hands of easily distracted, poorly trained police officers and the intensely motivating coverage of Black Lives Matter response. 

May 29, 2020, Portland Oregon





Unlike historical events, organized and directed by known leaders,  who has organized these events? Have these organizers acknowledged that ignoring the "Stay At Home Order" and calling the Black Community to march would expose them and their families to the destruction of the pandemic.

It is no secret that our black population ranks near the top in vulnerability! Second only to our elderly. 

In actuality; could this march of seeming solidarity be an act of kindness, or a kiss of death? Have theses marches initiate real action to find real solutions or are they an offering of guilt and ease like the donations of Small-Pox contaminated blankets to American Indian populations during the Small-Pox pandemic?

Time will certainly tell, but my questions is. Will THE NEWS? 
  
My son and daughter in law have maintained distancing from both sets of parents through the pandemic to protect us and her parent.

Doesn't our black community deserve as much? Why don't these organizers, and who are they.

Recently a spokesperson from Portland's OHSU describing the protests stated that she was not concerned over the possibility of  exposure because the protesters were wearing masks. Really? Look at the pictures. This type of statement is typical of the FAKE News we are so often faced with.  

To solve real social problems we have to look beyond our prejudices and consider real solutions. Soothing our racial consciences through overt gestures of solidarity, and knee-jerk reactions against police in general are not real solutions. If we have a problem with our police then we have to examine our methods of policing.  

Beyond all of the social disturbance, I would like see reporting on the general public's response to these disruptions. Before the riots and protests end and we move on to other things, I would like to hear police leadership express their concerns and hopes for change. 

I want to hear how they feel about having their experienced leadership replaced through political gesture and how they believe these action will affect all of our futures.

I want to hear about the history of changes that our police have already experienced and hear officers share their best strategies for effective community policing. I want them to tell me what real police professionalism looks like, how bad cops should be dealt with and how to avoid them when hiring.

Before the protests end, perhaps the news teams should ride along and present their stories and the challenges they face as well as the  victims of violence and the business owners who have suffered loss.

In my opinion, the one sided narrative presented during the vast majority of our news coverage puts much of it in the FAKE CATEGORY, especially when it is panders to special interest sponsors and select groups.

I would certainly watch more on the TV special coverage if stories were presented in greater depth. 

But what I see plays only to my morbid curiosity. I do not want to watch for hours waiting to see another person be assaulted or a shop owner's building be destroyed. This form of coverage does not address my sense of reason.

Today, many express a narrative of anger toward our political system, saying it does nothing but put our country up for sale to the rich as the highest bidders buy government influence. 

But I see a far more powerful form of influence manipulation. The manipulation of our public through these many forms of FAKE media. It seems that we have been trained like circus animals to welcome it. 

As to bribes and contribution misconduct in Congress, they can be corrected through legal action. But how do we correct a social addiction to media sensationalism and pandering?  



Whether you agree with my thoughts or not; 

Please DO TAKE THE TIME TO VIEW 
the PBS FRONTLINE links. 
They are repeated below.

"The Facebook Dilemma" part 1 
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T48KFiHwexM

"The Facebook Dilemma" part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuA4qxPbpQE

They are VERY INFORMATIVE and describe much of what we are seeing around us. Especially Part 2 at minute 8:50-10:55 and 13:10-14:20 AND ESPECIALLY 20:30-26:20 

Whether we are being influenced by the Russians or it is coming from other sources, it appears to be having the same effect in dividing our population into parties of shame and blame. 

To prosper, we have to find genuine way to work together for the good of our communities and country. This is not an easy thing. It does not occur through gesture alone as my recent Go-Fund-Me page created to help my Afro-American neighbor revealed.

Although racism was not been mentioned in the list of problems he has reported to me, lack of acceptance and the subsequent complaints from neighbors were.

This neighbor is the only black person in our neighborhood. He  recently experienced an eviction after the complete destruction of his property. After a long battle with the Vancouver building department and courts he was forced to allow his property to be abated. That is to have everything removed from the property.

For some time, his peculiarities were unacceptable to some of his neighbors and complaint driven code violations procedures were finalized by a kitchen fire that resulted in his property being condemned and eventually bulldozed. 

During the abatement process however, the actions of the City employees and the Police Officer present clearly demonstrated the themes of human respect and self restraint, as can be seen in the video below.  



CREATING HOMELESSNESS (part 1) A NOT SO BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FltqCvgBWM


CREATING HOMELESSNESS (part 2) 
Destruction and Hopes for Collaboration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktv9PNC6GGM

But the crowds of seemingly sympathetic respondents on Facebook did almost nothing to actually help my friend and the fund created to assist him rebuild did not grow. 

Over a period of two moths the a GO-Fund-ME page only received one pledge other than the original contribution that I made. Was this lack of support due to racism? Or was it a lack of acceptance for other reasons? 

Reguardless, When it comes to real action, gestures of sympathy online or even huge marches sponsored by (?) just don't cut it.

At this time of intense emotionalism and false assumptions of  social progress we need to stop ourselves and take a deep breathe. 

We need to open our eyes fully and engage our brains and relearn how to actually value each other. 

We all differ in many ways. But that does not mean that any of us deserve punishment or discrimination. We need to look at the cost of our biases and move beyond them. 

This is especially true for our African American neighbors who may be suffering greatly. And it is also true for our police officers who are also suffering. 


Saturday, June 6, 2020

Changing Culture and PC Religion

The Death Of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pushed Me To Join a Politically Active Temple.


Consider this writer and her point of view, her sense of dedication, and sense of allegiance to the causes of her peers. This rendering has been edited slightly. The original can be seen by clicking the link located at the end of this post. One should NOT ASSUME that, "The Temple," referred to through out the article is a Jewish Temple.

Members of my Temple do not believe in the supernatural or superstition. In the same way that some Unitarians and some Jews do not believe in God, members in my Temple are not worshipers, most are atheists. They are not affiliated in any way with the Church. Instead, my Temple stands as a symbol of resistance and rebellion against injustices. 

Just like other faiths, my Temple has a code that their members believe in deeply and use to guide their lives. These Seven Fundamental Tenets include that “one should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason,” that “the struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions,” and that “one’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.” 

When Justice Ginsburg’s death suddenly made combating the threats to reproductive rights and a government free from religious interference more urgent, I knew it was time to join them and support their conceptual and legal battles. 

Even before Ginsburg’s death, the Supreme Court was unwilling to provide adequate protection for a woman’s right to choose and to control her body. The court was unwilling to keep church and state separate. Now, without her voice of reason on the court ― let alone her vote ― Roe v. Wade is in imminent danger of being overturned not based on legal arguments or scientific reasoning, but because of religious objections to what is a safe and necessary procedure for the women who seek it out after discussion with their physician. Ginsburg’s replacement is all but certain to be vehemently anti-choice, with one of the top contenders belonging to a sect that actually used the term “handmaid” to refer to some women until the popularity of the TV series “The Handmaid’s Tale” gave the term negative connotations. 

Reading through the Seven Tenets, I was struck by how closely they aligned with the unwritten code I had used to try to guide my own life for several years. I realized, happily, that these were my people and had been for several years without my even knowing it. 

In the hours after Justice Ginsburg’s death, I sat wondering what the future would hold for my daughters. Their ability to live in a country where the religious beliefs of others would not play a role in their right to assert autonomy over their own bodies was suddenly, starkly, in danger. Traditional means of keeping abortion safe and legal seemed woefully inadequate to protect the rights that women in the generation before me had fought so hard to secure. 

Almost immediately I found strength in the my Temple’s efforts to turn religious arguments on their head by pushing for religious liberty for their members on an equal basis with believers in the dominant Christian faiths. And this is not just a theoretical push. The temple has launched campaigns and filed lawsuits to compel the government to do this in matters ranging from exemptions from legal mandates to cover birth control to the ability to display religious symbols in government buildings or allow religious clubs in public schools. By pointing out instances where the government has favored Christian rhetoric ― and filing legal challenges to stop it ― members from my Temple have transformed belief into action and has demonstrated what freedom fighting truly looks like. 

Our Temple members hope to appear before the Supreme Court in a case challenging a Missouri abortion law that requires those seeking to terminate their pregnancy to first receive materials asserting that their abortion would end the life of a separate, unique person. The temple argues that these materials violate the deeply held religious beliefs of one of our Temple members regarding bodily autonomy and scientifically reasonable personal choice. The argument that our Temple is using is the same one the Supreme Court effectively endorsed in the Hobby Lobby birth control case, for which Justice Ginsburg wrote the dissent ― that no one should have to follow a law that violates their deeply held religious beliefs. If a Christian should not have to do so based on their religion, members from my Temple should not have to either. This is what equality under the law means on a fundamental level and my Temple stands as a symbol of resistance and rebellion against tyranny. 

This is the organization I want to have standing up for my rights and for my daughters’. While I support more mainstream groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Church and State, my research has shown that the my Temple is truly in line with my beliefs about protecting our First Amendment rights and fighting laws that promote or are based on religious doctrine and that it is willing to use radical, creative and yet legally sound strategies to make its case. 

I was able to become a mother when I wanted on my own terms. Throughout my pregnancy, I had access to scientifically accurate information and the ability to make informed choices with my doctor. While I never had an abortion, I want the same opportunities to choose for my own daughters. I am far from certain these rights will exist 10 years from now when they may be deciding when, how or even whether to start their own families. 

We need creative, resolute thinkers who are willing to stand up for what they believe in and take concrete action to do so, and the members of my Temple are those kind of people. I am proud to now count myself among their ranks. 

There is a real chance that the Supreme Court will be lost for a generation or more to justices appointed for their religious beliefs rather than a deep understanding of the Constitution or a desire for justice to be carried out on an impartial basis. Because of this, I believe that the strength of those in my Temple ― and its members’ dedication to fighting for true freedom ― represents our best, last defense against anti-choice lawmakers who are seeking to assert power over women’s bodies and take away our right to choose. 

Everyone who cares about women having autonomy over their bodies should care about efforts to use religion to chip away at this right. We need to think outside the box to challenge what is coming and what is already here. The members of my Temple are already doing that, and by becoming a member, I believe I have joined a community of people who will stop at nothing to safeguard my family’s rights ― and all of our rights ― when they are at their most vulnerable. 

Jamie Smith is an attorney and mother who cares about civil rights. She can be reached at jamiesmithwrites@gmail.com. 


Now consider your own point of view, your own sense of dedication, and sense of allegiance to the causes and strategies that you share with your peers and consider the original content in the article below.
see original un-revised article at 

the photo source, and a very informative article on RGB's history and social activism through judicial action (not related to religion). 

As a Point of Contrast

Now consider a broadly traditionally Christian view on most of theses same topics as summarized in this very short video below.


"The Image of God"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-rzM5EojJY

I end with and nature video I created




Time to Lapse