(catching up with the Russians)
What if YOU or YOUR RELITIVE
were held as a POLITICAL PRISONER?
Is it possible that YOUR attendance
at a BLM protest could be morally WORSE
than a person WHO FOLLOWED the crowd
into the Capitol Building on January 6th?
AND IF SO... WHAT PUNISHMENTS
should be levied?
Currently our Legal system led by Attorney General Merrick Garland is doubling down on perceived threats to our Government with a, "New National Strategy!"
Attorney General Merrick says his policies and actions are motivated by the violence that occurred at the January 6th event and not any political point of view.
Hear him speak on this in the video below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2iv4QN9XnU
Currently the detained January 6th (Protestors/Insurrectionist) are being impoverished as they are held in a special jail facility where many are kept in isolation and denied any option of posting bail to obtain their release.
Hear Author Julie Kelly with commentator Mark Levin describe the conditions and situation that the January 6th Protesters/Insurrectionist face in the link below:
(above link no longer available)
Hear Author Julie Kelly with commentator Dinesh D'Souza
in a similar interview in link below.
(Story at minute 9:07to minute 36:16 in link)
And now consider our Presidents trip as he met with our European allies and opponents.
How can we who consider ourselves, "being back," as Moral Leader of the, "Free World," label Putin's actions as unjust when we mirror his unjust/unreasonable detention methods for treating political prisoners here in the U.S!
Our new Attorney General Garland says the ",actions," of our new, "national strategy," are about violence. But during the 2016 ANTIFA anti-Trump post election protests, and the hundreds of BLM/ANTIFA protests that have followed. Thousands have been injured and many scores killed, beginning with the man shot here in Portland during the 2016 ANTIFA led post election riot. Consider the following article.
Although extensive violence and destruction did occur at the January 6th event in Washington D.C., it occurred on a much smaller level and the people who died as a direct result were the protesters.
So what is different about these protests? To begin with...
THE JANUARY 6TH CROWD DID NOT RETURN!
Their rally had been HIJACKED in a way that was INTOLERABLE for the vast majority of those that had gathered.
And the LAWLESS ACTIONS that occurred HAVE BEEN UNIVERSALLY CONDEMNED by the political leaders of the attendees, along with the HIGH JACKING OF THEIR RALLY.
The THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of ATTENDEES demonstrated this rejection by their withdrawal and the absence of a reoccurrence.
Compare this with the REPEATED TOLERANCE FOR RIOTING, VIOLENCE and INTIMIDATING DESTRUCTION that the thousands of, what the press described as "Mostly Peaceful," BLM/ANTIFA protestors have REPEATEDLY DISPLAYED.
Consider the emotional trauma, the imposed poverty, the loss of safety, freedom and commerce experienced by those who were attacked by these unruly mobs. Consider how some POLITICAL LEADERS encouraged continued escalation and reoccurrence. How the destruction and violence WAS NOT CONDEMNED. Crimes repeatedly acceptable to the, "PROGRESSIVE CROWDS."
Crowds that demonstrated , passive acceptance, evidenced by their continued participation in predictable repeated REOCCURRENCES. These REPEAT attendees displayed TOLERANT ACCEPTANCE when they CAME BACK OVER AND OVER AND OVER...!
Were you in one of those crowds? Did you discover what was happening and leave? Or did you stay?
After you LEARNED what kind of things the crowd was TOLERATING, DID YOU REFUSE TO HAVE ANY PART OF IT?
DID YOU SEEK ANOTHER OPTION? OR DID YOU RETURN and inadvertently show support and approval of the trauma and destruction by your affirming presence.
IF SO, How can YOUR ACTIONS NOT BE WORSE than a person who followed a January 6th INSURRECTIONIST into the building?
And how can our Democrat Leaders, (specifically, V.P. Kamala Harris) Encourage these predictable acts of intimidating violence and destruction with LEGAL IMPUNITY to promote her political viewpoint and ideology...
Hear Kamala on the BLM/ANTIFA protests...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls
Even while pushing our legal system to harshly punish much smaller offences that occurred among those who HOLD POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES that SHE OPPOSES!
I believe that Garland IS DELUDED! Are you willing to join him?
We must remember that Hitler and his wealthy supporters like the Rockefeller's honestly believed that they were working to save the world from genetic degradation. From what many saw as a form of, human weed, pollution preached by Margret Sanger and many others of that time period.
They truly believed that their "Progressive Cause, "to change the future of humanity," was far more important than any temporary abuse of power. This attitude was so prevalent that it successfully deluded much of the world including much of academia. And today we still refuse to acknowledge the true lifecycle of a human being for social convenience.
Again, take a moment and compare. Compare Merrick Garland statements to the Kelly report at the link and then consider carefully. What do you really think?
Hear Author Julie Kelly with commentator Dinesh D'Souza
in a similar interview in link below.
(GO TO minute 9:07 - minute 36:16 for topic)