Friday, April 7, 2023

Which Path, Ecology or Social Idealism, Starvation or Responsible Science

Can We Continue Down 

Both Paths?

The Worlds Most Accomplished
Agricultural Scientist Would Say

YES!

 Consider the words from the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Norman Borlaug, attributed with saving billions of lives..

"I now say that the world has the technology - either available or well advanced in the research pipeline - to feed on a sustainable basis a population of 10 billion people. The more pertinent question today is whether farmers and ranchers will be permitted to use this new technology? While the affluent nations can certainly afford to adopt ultra low-risk positions, and pay more for food produced by the so-called "organic" methods, the one billion chronically undernourished people of the low income, food-deficit nations cannot."

But he also warned decades ago...


As stated, this quote is from decades ago.

 In November of 2022 global population reached 8 billion.

 But the question remains. Will we succeed or fail?

In the late 1960's the world's agricultural efforts did fail. It failed to feed the world's 3.5 billion people and hundreds of thousands starved during droughts in arid countries. At that time, our leading highly educated elites, led by Dr. Paul Erlich, author of, “The Population Bomb," thought the task was hopeless and casually suggested, "We should probably just let them starve."  Government leaders in India forced the sterilization of millions and China forcefully implemented the, "One Child Policy," with all the abuses that came with it.

Hear Dr. Erlich, in this short video that highlights this crisis and how it was resolved.

 


Why overpopulation fears haven't come true | Freethink Wrong 

Freethink

The video also contrasts elitist views with, more practical problem solvers like U.S. Agricultural Researcher, and Nobel Prize winner, Norman Borlaug. Borlaug developed a high yield strain of wheat that grew well in arid climates. Although the strain required little rain, it did require extensive fertilizing in comparison to other strains.

Today's cultural leaders with global warming concerns are now seeking to forbid fertilizer use across our globe. But have they considered the probable outcome? Have you? 

Could it return us to frequent regional crop failures and significantly lower yields. The Borlaug Strain produced up to 10 times the yield, depending on conditions, after adding fertilization. Wouldn't a return to the practices of the past also return us to the failures of the past?

Could this be intentional? Could the globalist goal be frequent depopulation events through episodes of starvation? Especially if implemented during this time of relative climate instability called, "Climate Change."


But that seems unimaginable. Could eliminating fertilizer really cripple global food production to the point of causing starvation? Modern civilized people wouldn’t allow it! Removing the option of fertilizer wouldn’t really remove the food multiplying effect of high yield crops. Would it? Depopulation couldn’t really be the goal!

Surprisingly, this type of action is not new. In the 1930’s and 1950’s leaders imposed starvation measures that took over 40 million lives in the Soviet Union and nearly 55 million in Communist China.

These actions were very effective in securing their cause. They demonstrated their power to overwhelm and control existing systems and the cost's these, "Socialist Republic's," were willing to pay to unify their population and remove all opposition to governmental policies. 

Consider the short video below and realize it was created before Covid-19 controversies. A time where American's were not coerced by viewpoint censorship and policed by disinformation controls. Do any of their actions remind you of what is happening now?

 


 When China went to war against the sparrows

  The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered

 And if you are interested in context and how history repeats itself, you will appreciate the, "swimming video," pictured below. It is concise.

Please realize that the Red Guard mentioned in the video was made up of Jr. High and early High School age youth that were taught in their school system to reject the values of the past. Not surprisingly, This is also the age group that is targeted by the controversial tictok App. 

Very recently this same age group of America's school students walked out of their classes across our nation in a, "nationwide student protest," against current gun ownership laws. What was reported can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tclp5kBKQs . titled, "Thousands of students walk-out in protest for gun control"   NewsChannel 5.   

Surprisingly absent from the reports I reviewed is any information on who is organizing these protests and what these organizers have scheduled to happen next. In the video below we see a very intense report on the sustained protests of the student army of the Red Guard that brought change to China.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXByOrRrO7c

 The power of a picture in China's Cultural Revolution 

 All of these were important steps in the Communist’s political march to secure centralized power and replace intellectual and moral independence with submission to the collectivist narrative. 

Could this be happening in America today? Did you feel a pull to unify with those who demanded rigid enforcements of a collectivist narrative response during the Global Covid Shutdowns? Did those who disagreed with you deserve punishment and censorship?
 
What about the irregularities of having an election during the lockdowns? Were those with apprehensions criminals who deserved punishment? Were the doctors and scientists at variance with these  narratives also criminals? And the 2020 campaign? Was it typical or irregular? And what about the narratives enshrouding the January 6th event?
 
Do you accept and seek to enforce these narratives, or do you seek to explore and understand the benefits of a nation that allows differing points of view? 
  
But how does all of this relate to crops and restrictions on fertilizer? 
It serves to eliminate the fork in the road. It signifies an escalation in polarization. Currently we are committed to promoting both directions. Today ideas of Public Health and Welfare are waning. They are being displaced by elitist goals of  Environmental Restoration and Protection. 

(Public Health and Safety)                    or                      (Environmental Restoration)


Passively restricting food supplies in this manner will demonstrate our commitment to make any sacrifice necessary to, "Save Our Planet!"

If fertilizer restrictions are fully implemented, hypothetically, up to 5 billion people could starve, relieving the world of over half of the human strain that now taxes her ecosystems. Many progressive leaning intellectuals would call this sacrifice, necessary for the long-term good of our planet, much like Margret Sanger's talk about controlling "human weeds."

But how can we allow this sacrifice! Doesn’t anyone remember, "Silence is Violence," or, "Black Lives Matter?"  On our globe, the highest concentration of, "Black and Brown Lives," are located in arid areas, with nutrient poor soil. Considering these facts, it is apparent that saving black and brown lives is not the goal of today's social and governmental elites.

These slogans may be useful for political manipulation and gaining political power, but they are blatant lies when it actually comes to implementing policies to protect black and brown lives both in the West and across the globe.


Consider their actions in our recent global battle with Covid-19.

In the west our leaders repeatedly refused to provide even the first dose of vaccination for those living in most of the southern hemispheres, which includes Africa. Even as we in the North and Western Europe were receiving our fourth doses. 

At that time, Mike Ryan, executive director of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergencies Program described his frustration in the link below. See it at minute 00:23:12. of the W.H.O. press conference where he said, 

In the West, it's like, “We're planning to hand out extra life jackets to people who already have life jackets, while we're leaving other people to drown. see original W.H.O. post at https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-virtual-press-conference-transcript---18-august-2021

The extended story and timeline of our world response to Covid-19 is available at this Link:  

https://www.seekinghigherbeing.org/2021/12/a-prayer-for-healing-starting-with-our.html

Fortunately for up to 5 billion of us living on the planet today, Borlaug was not an, "ecological progressive.” He persevered for decades and overcame stiff intellectual opposition from governments and leaders across the globe. Eventually he went directly to the farmers in many countries.

I am amazed at how our leaders and media so calmly ignore such realities! Imagine ignoring the potential for up to half of your own family dying, and dying from something that is quite preventable. Our proven methods have been working well. Why would we abandon them?

If you aren't concerned, perhaps you should be. 

As I said, fertilizers are essential for the high-yield wheat and many other crops that feed most of the world. Today fertilizer production has already been crippled due to the war in Ukraine, as Ukraine is a top producer and production shortages could also be a problem. 

But Initiatives to ban fertilizer use? This is insanity!

How can God not judge us for our irresponsibility in such matters! Perhaps He is. The side-story in the Link below was written several years ago when we visited Philadelphia. It presents Abraham Lincoln's View on Judgement as related to Slavery both then and now.
 


IS JUDGMENT COMING? LINCOLN THOUGHT YES! 

WHAT ABOUT YOU?

Click Link Below for this side story: 

https://www.thesubwaywalls.com/2019/10/is-judgment-coming-lincoln-thought-yes.html

It seems that we are truly asleep in our complacency much like the Bible account of the rich man that ignored Lazarus's plight. If you haven't considered faith in the past, now is the time to call upon the Name of the Lord and be saved. If you are curious get a Bible and start in the New Testament in the Book of John.

 In closing, reconsider these words from the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Norman Borlaug, attributed with saving several billions of lives..

"I now say that the world has the technology - either available or well advanced in the research pipeline - to feed on a sustainable basis a population of 10 billion people. The more pertinent question today is whether farmers and ranchers will be permitted to use this new technology? While the affluent nations can certainly afford to adopt ultra low-risk positions, and pay more for food produced by the so-called "organic" methods, the one billion chronically undernourished people of the low income, food-deficit nations cannot."


By developing and applying the scientific and technological skills of the twentieth century for “the well-being of mankind throughout the world”, he may still see Isaiah’s prophesies come true: “… And the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose… And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water…”

See full article at

~ Norman Borlaug~ Occupation: Agricultural Scientist
Born: March 25, 1914, Died at age 95 on September 12, 2009


The link above is to the Playlist above that  presents Borlaug's story  along with other noteworthy threats to our existence past and present. (CLICK LINK ABOVE NOT PICTURE) to see playlist.


photo and quote source:
https://www.azquotes.com/author/1686-Norman_Borlaug

Sunday, March 19, 2023

How History Qualifies Truth! Consider John, Sam, Martin, Saul and Tucker.

THREE ODD HIGHLIGHTS
FROM PROVERBS CHAPTER 18:


#13 He who answers a matter before he hears it. It is folly and shame to him.

 #15 The heart of the prudent acquires knowledge and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge.

 #17 The first one to plead his cause seems right until his neighbor comes and examines him.
 
For history to be History, context matters.
 It matters more than anything else if discovering and understanding, "Truth," is the goal.
 
Through the last few decades, the most influential voice in reshaping views on American History, including beliefs about, "America's Revolution," was social activist 
Saul Alinsky. His teachings and mentoring literally shaped the attitudes and actions of Presidents Obama and Clinton as well as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who wrote her thesis paper on Alinsky's work and philosophy. 
 
Alinsky wrote the book, “Rules for Radicals,” which I believe, wrongly characterized the beginning of America’s Revolution as a well planned and well executed manipulation for advancing acts of, "necessary," injustice.
 
He attributed the success and momentum of the American uprising to the, "necessary," manipulations called for by Samuel Adams, second cousin to John Adams. Alinsky presented unjust manipulation as the central, "necessary," feature of our American form of Governing.
 
But Alinsky conveniently ignored the greater accomplishment of Sam's second cousin John Adams, who under great duress and threat to his own life fought for and won the acquittal of the British soldiers that fired on the taunting crowd at the, “Boston Massacre.”
 
The success of the American cause was not advanced nearly as much by the intimidating agitation promoted by Sam Adams, as our current culture would have you believe. It's cohesive strength was advanced more by a growing faith in the kind of character that John Adams displayed through this act that he much later labeled as;
 
“One of the best pieces of service I have rendered my country. Judgement of death against those soldiers would have been as foul a stain upon this country as the executions of the Quakers or witches.” Adams wanted a nation of rule and law, not one of mob justice, even if it meant defending members of the oppressive army of his enemy.
The story is portrayed in the video below.

John Adams: The President Who Defended the Redcoats
 
The cementing factor that allowed, the formation of a, “New American Union,” a union of formerly loyal British Subjects aligned with American Revolutionaries was based on this type of, “Equal Justice.” A blind justice under law, according to the commonly held Judeo-Christian Ethic. This was drastically different than the politically enhanced narrative intended by Sam Adams or imposed by King George. 
 
Fears and the strong desire for control fought against this, Best Outcome," on both sides. But in the end, the courage of conviction to discover and uphold truth won. 
 
Today, commentator Tucker Carlson has come under fire for making public and providing comment on the recently released videos pertaining to the January 6th event in Washington D.C..  Is this the type of truth that Tucker is seeking? What do you think? Should he be shut down? Or encouraged?
 
Take a moment to listen to what he has to say and consider history  before deciding what you think? 

 

 

Fox News host Tucker Carlson fires back at critics...


The link below also presents another perspective on the U.S. deaths that occurred through the many months of what journalists called, the "mostly peaceful," anti-Trump-election and BLM protests. This article is from a news source from outside of the U.S. Please take a look.  

At least 25 Americans were killed during protests and political unrest in 2020




(click link below to read article.)

The vast majority of deaths described in this article were the result of violent opportunists, enticed by the chaos and vulnerability that these continuing protests, frequently turned riots, repeatedly created. This is the type of manipulation that both Samuel Adams and Saul Alinsky called for.

In August of 1963 another activist, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. stated, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” Below is the final portion of his last speech on April 3, 1968. Earlier in this speech he described his deep commitments to resisting intimidation, to strengthening the brotherhood of humanity, to strive for economic and racial justice through non-violence and his profound appreciation for the source of his hope and strength.


Unusual courage and strength of character is what he and John Adams displayed. This strength of character did more than, "make them known." It empowered and directed many others in our nation to find their strength of character as well and caused Adams to be elected as our second President of the newly formed United States of America.

This clip from HBO dramatized the challenges he faced:



Although the Tucker Carlson presentation may seem inflammatory,  we as a people have a responsibility to perceive and appreciate what is true even more than the feelings of compassion or anger that move us emotionally. We have a responsibility even when the truth challenges our personal prejudices, the narratives of our culture or the idealism of our friends. 

In contrast, to John Adams' demonstration of sacrificial integrity, and Martin's courageous commitment to non-violence our current political administrators actually encouraged the ongoing agitation that extended this chaos, and our media and criminal prosecutors obscured these deaths and refused to prosecute the property crimes that so effectively destroyed many of our communities. This was truly an example of the kind of, "necessary," injustice that second cousin Samuel Adams and Saul Alinsky called for.  

Rather than Tear Down: Commit to Build and Strengthen!

As Americans we have a historic civic responsibility to commit too, and encourage everyone we know to reject and refuse to be involved in socially destructive organizations and events. As individuals, if or when something we are involved in starts to go badly, we need to resist, challenge wrongdoing or even vote with our feet and leave immediately. REPEATED escalations to violence and community destruction is what separated the January 6th event from the other protests of that time. On the January 6th rally, the vast majority attendees simply left. They did not remain to provide coercive force of power and cover for the insurrectionists. They simply left and did not return for repeat performances. 

The challenges of today are not really that different than the challenges faced in times past. These challenges have been common t
hrough out human history as has injustice when systems fall short or fail, especially when they are overwhelmed. But are the turmoil's of today the result of flawed people working in imperfect systems or are they the deliberate acts of destructive manipulators working behind the scenes? Consider...
 

The Cloward-Piven Strategy: Orchestrating A Crisis So Government Can “Solve” It


See article at: 

and the original article that presents the manipulative principle in great detail. It is well worth the read. The title is misleading as it dismisses the human costs of the political power they seek.

See it at:

Every system known to mankind can fail when it is overwhelmed, be it our Criminal Justice System, our Court System, our Public Safety and Policing System, our Immigration System, our Health Care System and even our Financial System. And they all fail more often, more severely and cause more harm when they are overwhelmed. 

Doesn't it seem odd that under some administrations the phenomena of systems dependence and overload decreases, and under other  administrations recently working systems seem to explode? 

In the second example, we are told that these failures provide those leaders with opportunities to, "build back better." Like in the article above.

But what about the suffering and destruction that occurred in the explosion? And why don't the losses that we the people experience affect the leaders that created them? On the contrary these leaders reap extreme rewards in power, prestige and wealth. 

I wonder if Sam Adams, or Saul Alinsky would have felt the same about these necessary injustices if their family members were unintentionally caught in the riots that they inspired? If they had been shot, brutalized or crippled? I am certain that if they thought their loved ones were in harms way the would have warned them. But what about the rest of us. People are not pawns to be discarded. 

I believe that we should take these recent events with their governmental responses as a warning. Our choices are simple. Either we need to submissively surrender our critical thinking skills and embrace the ultimate knowledge and control that these leaders seek to  impose, "for our welfare," or learn from the, "truths," of history.

Consider this comparison to a centrally controlled life under socialism in East Germany before the wall came down. 

In my opinion, if we are truly seeking Justice. We need to rediscover and be led by the genuine truths of history. We need to do as John Adams did and exert our,  "Utmost in Character," and as Martin Luther King Jr. did in," Continuing in Courage," to cause the systems that we all rely on to succeed, to the true benefit of our friends, our families and our communities. 

Thanks' for reading, and be sure to stay informed. Be sure to ask hard questions. And be sure to support conservative candidates. Because, "Conservatism," a 
commitment to build on our proven successes and working principles is far more beneficial than the, "necessary destruction," of tearing down to build-back-better on unproven theories through consolidated governmental power and control. 

And for goodness sake, be sure to register and vote.

Wednesday, March 15, 2023

Nothing Funny About Surrendering Our Autonomy

When I was a kid,
"Mad Magazine"
was Funny and Outrageous!

(Double-Click-Picture to Enlarge)

But with the topics in the picture above... 
"Not so much." 

Have you been following any of the hearings that are going on in our House of Representatives?

So How did we get to this place in American History? 

How did we abdicate our assumed freedom of organized  political expression to the whims of an elitist media.
  
How did we underestimate their intent?

How did we allow our, "Politically Correct," Elite Class to;

1) LEGALLY alter our Election Rules to place rural communities at a disadvantage.

2) Project their offensive cultural biases through our public media without opportunity for rebuttal?
 
3) Control and Censor Public Social Media Communications.
 

In the critical moments of the last Presidential campaign The President's microphone went silent.... 

(According to President Macron of France.)

Well not only his microphone. That avenue of communication had been blocked long before the election as his message was continually hijacked and subjected to pundit spin. From the beginning of his campaign, Trump's statements to the media were consistently censored, or conveniently contorted to fit the narratives that would feed the media's thirst for creating contempt.

Many say Trump was a fool for his blunt, kneejerk, from the gut campaigning style. They say that he got exactly what he deserved for his crassness and harsh criticism of the, "Traditional Press!"

Didn't he label them, "Fake News." What should he expect?

Others applauded his maverick resourcefulness and determination as he maneuvered in and around the traditional media moguls, bumping and badgering and blazing new pathways for expressive freedom and dialogue.

Regardless... When the, "Official Press," wasn't, misrepresenting his motivations by innuendo or deemphasizing and minimizing his many accomplishments, they simply ignored him. As they do to this day.

Do you remember his obsessive chantings of, "Lock her up?" 

When I heard it I considered it, "way over the top," and judged him as being pompous. But in time, it was actually understandable. When you consider the findings of the Durham Probe and who financed the massive public deception resuling in an unjustified impeachment trial. Consider the video content on this topic below.



Analyst arrested with lying to FBI about Christopher Steele’s Trump-Russia dossier in Durham probe
CNBC Television
(Note: this is not Fox News)

But, why so much with this President? Was this really a new response? Or was it just, his boisterous presence that pushed these activist out from the shadows like so many hungry rats.


What about Trump's monumental international success in dealing with the Israeli/Arab crisis, This Jerusalem Post Article is titled...

DIPLOMATIC AFFAIRS:
The Abraham Accords domino effect will lead to more peace deals... 
It was hard to predict in January 2020 that, by the end of the year, Israel would have relations with four more Arab countries.  By LAHAV HARKOV
Published: JANUARY 1, 2021 13:53

(see full article content at link below)
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/the-abraham-accords-domino-effect-will-lead-to-more-peace-deals-653940

These treaties were considered so important that they were labeled, "The most important strategic development in the region," by Amwar Mohammed Gargash, diplomatic advisor to the President of the United Arab Emirates, at the 2022 BR24 Munich Security Conference. Strategic, because of the, "Agenda of tolerance, stability and prosperity," that they created.

A more likely assumption is that his political presence and unique successes in fostering U.S. and Multinational Autonomy, as displayed in the Abrahamic Peace Accords, p
osed a threat. It threatened those who were anxious to resume their agenda of  inflaming areas of opposition and conflict and then profiting from the process of providing weapons and funding activist elements in opposing factions.

But since the 2020 election, with our very abrupt and awkwardly executed withdrawal from Afghanistan, coupled with our return to the divisive policies of Obama, Kerry and Biden, we appear to be resuming this middleman role and abandoning the job of genuine Peacemaker.

And in the, "Biden Vacuum", China has stepped forward. 

Just recently they have seized the momentum created by Trump to broker a peace plan between Iran and Saudi Arabia.




How important was China for the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal? 
| DW News
  DW News

Currently 
China’s President Xi Jinping is also presenting a twelve point plan for ending the war in Ukraine that President Zelensky is anxious to respond too. Will President Xi succeed?




Ukraine's Zelensky wants to meet China’s Xi Jinping to discuss peace plan – BBC News
 BBC News

But enough about Biden. What about Trump's accomplishments? Shouldn't we recognize the international cooperation and order that Trump's policies brought to Mexico and the U.S. Southern border during his time in office? 

What about the reductions in human trafficking and reductions in drug smuggling during his term? 

Our current approach has transferred hundreds of millions to even billions to the Cartels who hold the monopoly on providing illegal access across our Southern Border. Lets not forget the brave sacrifices that Mexican candidates made with the hopes for change during Trump's time in office where international border cooperation increased. 



Mexican candidate shot dead while posing for selfie


Mexico: 130 politicians killed ahead of elections


And let's not forget to compare Trumps' Presidential response to the Global Covid-19 Pandemic, to how other administrations responded to the AIDS crisis just a few years earlier.

The following Health and Human Services article from September 16, 2020 describes the ACTION Trump took that led to multi-millions of doses that were administered before he left office. This included the very vaccinations that Joe Biden received.

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2349357/trump-administration-releases-covid-19-vaccine-distribution-strategy/

This quick and focused action allowed over 3 million doses to be delivered to the public by December 13, 2020. His was an emphasis on providing options, not punishments and control.
 

delivered to all 50 states

If your current understanding does not recognize these facts, it is probably due to the effect of what Trump bluntly described as,

"Fake News."
Or more precisely,
the consistent patterns of politically
motivated selective, biased or even
activist reporting that dominate
so many U.S. media platforms.


So how did somebody like Trump get elected in the first place?

Early on in the race, candidate Trump, had established many effective, pathways to communicate with the American people. Through social media channels and in person rallies. These were his most direct means. As you may remember he spoke and, "Tweeted," freely and frequently on various social media channels.


...and this is where the CRITICAL SILENCING occurred!
...During the clutch moments of the 2020 election!


In fact, his communications were officially blocked and their content degraded in the most humiliating ways!

Consider the response of French President Emanuel Macron to these acts of censorship...

"...suddenly cut the mic and put the mic on mute and killed the platforms where it was possible for him and his supporters to express themselves...because of the speech is decided by a private player, a private social network. I want it to be decided by a law voted by your representative or regulation..."
 

To hear President Macron's full comment, Click link below

This sentiment was harmonized with by several European Leaders.
 
But was this rejection of both candidate and President Trump by our Social Policy elites, social media moguls and mainstream narrators valid? 

Had Trump truly fallen from the favor of the American people? 

Although his antics were often annoying, the SURVEYS of the time say a DEFINITE NO! Consider the link below that describes the popularity of President Trump during the very time in question...

On the contrary...
American's that were polled
expressed great favor for Trump

Consider this 20/20 Gallup Pole



(Click Link below for Gallup article.)
https://news.gallup.com/poll/328193/donald-trump-michelle-obama-admired-2020.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_content=morelink&utm_campaign=syndication

So what did happen?

President Trump Permanently Banned From
Leading to additional widespread censoring and social cancelling according to the normalization of imposed, "Political Correctness."




Jim Jordan CALLS OUT "BIG MEDIA"
and "BIG TECH" Mar 12, 2021
"....Today big tech has more (political power) than Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Henry Ford combined." through controlling the content of what we see."

And in harmony Glenn Greenwald calls for long overdue Anti-Trust-Legislation to protect the public from the monopoly like power of these biased organizations.  




So to our shame in the eyes of the world, we continue under the yoke of our media led elitist control. 
  
So, who would have actually won in 2020 
if there had been no interference to hindered the process of a free and fair election
Who knows?  No one knows for sure, but we do know that no election has ever been run perfectly. 

But the size of the margins of error do matter because it is in the margins that the elections are often won. 

I am certain that we can do better. We must!

But all of that is behind us now. What matters now is that we support our elected Representatives who are working to correct these problems.

We all need to Wake Up and Demand 
the best government possible.


One that is responsive and accountable to all of our people! The world is counting on us to act.

So write your legislators and let them know your concerns with the abusive powers of both, "big tech," and biased news organizations that seek to silence the voices of those in rural areas and those that continue to hold traditional values.